WLAN Architecture: Cloud-Managed Vs. On-Premises

emile guillemot sYMgkKkHpGI unsplash
emile guillemot sYMgkKkHpGI unsplash

The advancement of WLAN architecture plan 

When enterprise WLANs were at first deployed, each wireless path was designed and managed independently from other APs on the same network. By then, this wasn’t an issue, because most companies allocated unequivocal areas for wireless hotspots. These areas were typical places, for instance, conference rooms, lobbies and outdoor yards – any area with many customers and relatively few wired ports.

As the demand for Wi-Fi access increased within the enterprise, so did the infrastructure required to supply it. Out of the blue, network administrators wanted to manage hundreds, even thousands, of APs attempting to cover entire buildings and grounds with a wireless signal. 

Fundamentally more complicated, the APs couldn’t interact with one another, so technical issues – among them co-channel associations, power modifications, and client roaming – made many networks insecure and whimsical.

To solve these technical issues, WLAN vendors created remote LAN controllers to propel data and management control-plane data back to a single zone. The controller’s duty is to be a single choke point for AP arrangement, correspondence, and, most of the time, policy approval. The APs themselves lose their individual insight, and the controller transforms into the brain for the entire WLAN.

This arrangement has a few important advantages. To begin with, the wireless controller directs all the APs all through the network and, hence, has a complete point of view on the WLAN. IT staff can use the controller to roll out clever radio improvements required. This enables WLAN administrators to alter wireless channels when correspondence occurs, change wireless signal quality when APs go offline or online, and switch clients beginning with one AP then onto the following.

The second noteworthy benefit is both control-plane and data-plane traffic is tunneled back to the wireless controller before its set onto the local data LAN. This can be both a positive and negative from a data-plane perspective. 

It’s a positive as in wireless policies for unequivocal help set identifiers are implemented at only a single area, making policy management phenomenally easy. It also offers better security, as traffic from an AP is moved in an encoded tunnel. In any case, the overall structure can create bottlenecks and single motivations behind failure if not arranged properly.

With a cloud-managed wireless LAN, APs interface with a virtual controller, typically arranged in a public cloud on the web. Control-plane data, AP management, and other WLAN services are performed between the cloud controller and the local APs over a web connection. The primary design difference between an on-premises controller and a cloud-based controller is the methods by which the data-plane traffic streams.

  1. The upsides of on-premises WLAN architecture

LAN architecture: The primary concern to take a look at is the current status of your LAN. Customers who already have an on-premises wireless controller may essentially be wanting to upgrade. 

If you want to change from a Layer 2 and Layer 3 perspective, changing to a cloud-based system would require reconfiguring the network. Need to permit the cloud-controlled network to offload wireless data directly to the LAN, rather than having it tunneled back to the on-premises controller.

In view of the size of the network, this would put aside a great deal of time to accomplish. Along these lines, for a few, essentially climbing to a forefront on-premises controller that tunnels both control-and data-plane information back to the local controller is the easiest decision. 

Web accessibility: Cloud-managed wireless LANs rely vivaciously upon the web – to work properly, which can be a check if your web network is sketchy.

Instead of connecting wireless control data to and from local APs, the cloud controller also often performs other wireless services. For example, Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol provisioning and validation.

These services make additional internet bandwidth overhead. Thusly, if your web accessibility is seriously utilized, problematic, or encounters latency and throughput issues, it’s optimal to remain with an on-premises approach that controls these functions locally. 

WLAN complexity: In many conditions, on-premises controllers offer unquestionably more prominent flexibility with respect to the real structure and deployment of the WLAN. This joins additionally developed support for legacy Wi-Fi devices and applications and more granular command over specific wireless settings.

For enterprises that use countless APs in immense grounds, diverse on-premises controllers can collaborate to provide solid WLAN access and failover for clients. In such complex WLAN circumstances, on-premises controllers offer definitely more unmistakable on-premises controller benefits than cloud controllers.

  1. Cloud-managed WLAN 

The major bit of having the choice to manage a WLAN from the cloud is the versatility and simplicity of the configuration. If your affiliation is geologically dispersed, a cloud-managed WLAN lets you control your entire wireless network from a single interface. Strangely, on-premises solutions typically should be deployed and independently manage in each region.

Another benefit is flexibility. Since your controller is managed by a service provider in the cloud, you no longer must be stressed over gear machine flexibility limitations. With on-premises controller assemblies, you can thump against an extraordinary number of wireless access points that can be managed on a single platform.

Expansion beyond that means either climbing to a greater machine, or breaking out and manage various controllers. For example, a Cisco 5500 series wireless controller supports a limit of 500 APs. With a cloud-managed WLAN, there is no maximum limit to worry over. Moreover, because of that the basic controller software and infrastructure are managed by the service provider, your infrastructure staff doesn’t have to contribute time and effort on upgrading and fixing the WLAN equipment. You should just arrange an update window when you need the upgrades to occur. This is often an ignored bit of advantage that can truly be a huge time and money-saver as time goes on.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here