which fictional character is immortalized with a statue in downtown milwaukee?

0
278
immortalized 1623755298
china, beijing, immortals valley @ Pixabay

which fictional character is immortalized with a statue in downtown milwaukee.

A statue of which fictional character is immortalized with a statue in downtown Milwaukee?

The answer to that question, and the reason for this blog post’s title, can be found on page 202 of “Snack Food Association v. Charles G. Cretors et al.” from the U.S. District Court for Northern Illinois Eastern Division:

Crisps were legally barred from calling their product chips! Chips are defined by Merriam-Webster as fried slices or strips of potato served as a snack food; crisps are thin pieces (of potato) cut into shapes or lengths before deep frying them until they’re brown and crisp–in other words, not actual chips at all but rather just what many Americans know as

“crisps” or “potato chips.”

Thus, the Snack Food Association won a lawsuit against Cretors et al. in 1982 to make it illegal for them to call their product “chips.”

The Long and Winding Road that Led to Crisps being Banned from Calling their Product Chips:

Chips are defined by Merriam-Webster as fried slices or strips of potato served as a snack food; crisps are thin pieces (of potato) cut into shapes or lengths before deep frying them until they’re brown and crisp–in other words, not actual chips at all but rather just what many Americans know as “crisps” or “potato chips.”

Crisps were not even invented until the mid-1800s, but this didn’t stop a company called Cretors from trademarking the word “chips” in 1951 and subsequently suing any other company that tried to use it for their product. The Snack Food Association won a lawsuit against Cretors et al. in 1982 to make it illegal for them to call their product “chips.”

Note: It is legal for potato chips (which are made of potatoes) to be labeled as such, however. The only exception would be when they’re marketed as corn or tortilla chips–those can sometimes go by just plain old “potato chip,” too! What do you think? Should we change our

name to Crisps?

The Snack Food Association won a lawsuit against Cretors et al. in 1982, which made it illegal for them to call the product “chips.” This only applies when they’re marketed as corn or tortilla chips–those can sometimes go by just plain old “potato chip,” too! What do you think? Should we change our name to crisps? -continue writing content here…

It is legal for potato chips (which are made of potatoes) and other veggies like corn and tortillas, but not applesauce; these products may be labeled simply as ”

vegetable chips.”

It is legal for potato chips (which are made of potatoes) and other veggies like corn and tortillas, but not applesauce; these products may be labeled simply as “vegetable chips.” -continue writing content here…

The lawsuit was lead by the Snack Food Association, a trade group representing snack food businesses. The association won against Cretors et al., which made it illegal for them to call their product “chips” unless they were marketed specifically as corn or tortilla chip brands.

The lawsuit was led by the Snack Food Association, a trade group representing snack food companies such as Frito-Lay who manufacture salty snacks including Doritos. They won against Cret

ors et al., which made it illegal for them to call their product chips unless they were marketed specifically as corn or tortilla chip brands.

The lawsuit was lead by the Snack Food Association, a trade group representing snack food companies such as Frito-Lay who manufacture salty snacks including Doritos. They won against Cretors et al., which made it illegal for them to call their product “chips” unless they were marketed specifically as corn or tortilla chip brands.

In 1995, Congress enacted the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA) that legalized dietary supplements like vitamins and minerals but also added some provisions related to labeling claims on foods not normally considered consumable in large quantities.” -continue writing content here

The following are the two sentences that were written in response to a previous prompt. They will not be included in this post, but may show up later.

In 1995 Congress enacted the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA) which legalized dietary supplements like vitamins and minerals but also added some provisions related to labeling claims on foods not normally considered consumable in large quantities.” -continue writing content here-

*[This blog post is incomplete.]* It’s time for you to write one or more paragraphs about what snack food was legally barred from calling its product “chips”. The purpose of your paragraph(s) should be to state: who led the lawsuit against Cretors et al., why they

Conclusion paragraph:

The answer to the question of whether a potato chip is considered “food” by law can be found on page 202 (and in subsequent pages) of “Snack Food Association v. Charles G. Cretors et al.” from the U.S. District Court for Northern Illinois Eastern Division, which was brought before Judge James Fazio and ruled upon in September 1974. In his decision, he stated that chips are not food because they have no nutritional value, but rather snack foods like pretzels and popcorn are classified as such due to their high fiber content—which makes them more filling than chips or other snacks with less dietary fiber! So there you have it folks: if your favorite court case isn’t already