which of these company figureheads was a real person?

0
415
1623754703
undefined @ Unsplash

which of these company figureheads was a real person?Jonathan Crisp founded the company in 1956.

ore a suit and tie to work

his company was the first in Britain to make crisps.

wanted his chips called “crisps” not “potato chips.”

wasn’t allowed by law, because of trademark issues with the US potato chip company.

resorted to calling them ‘chips’ on their packaging instead; where they stayed until 1998 when M&M Food Industries (the owner of Sun Chip) challenged them again for copyright infringement and won.

However, Jonathan Crisp himself died in 1992 so he never got to enjoy this victory – or even know about it!- as his son took over running the business after him.The ban lasted from July 1991 until 1994 but still appears sporadically.

on the packaging of other companies.

out from “chips” to keep them in compliance with trademark law – and this is where they are today.

The Long and Winding Road that Led to Crisps being Banned from Calling their Product Chips: Jonathan Crisp founded his company back in 1956, but he wanted his product officially called ‘crisps’ not ‘potato chips’. Unfortunately for him (and fortunately for us!), American potato chip makers had already registered the name, so he was legally barred from calling it crisps on either side of the Atlantic. He settled instead on using a word meaning ‘a thin slice or cut,’ which appropriately enough also shares its root with words like crispness and crispy; these days that word is pronounced crisps- with a ‘p’.

along its journey, it has been called many things: chips (in the US), crinkle cut (in Canada) and potato curls.

and finally settled on calling them “chips,” which was not only the most popular term in North America but also one of their original names from before they were forced to change it by American law.

long history led us here today! The end of this article will describe what snack food was legally barred from calling its product “chips”. Crisps are an English type of chip made out primarily potatoes or cornmeal; technically, any thin slice can be called a crisp – but these days we usually think of them as fried

potato or corn chips. Crisps have been called many things over the years, including crisps (in Australia and New Zealand), crinkle cut (in Canada) and potato curls. And finally they settled on calling them “chips,” which was not only the most popular term in North America but also one of their original names from before they were forced to change it by American law.

Crisps are an English type of chip made out primarily potatoes or cornmeal; technically, any thin slice can be called a crisp – but these days we usually think of them as fried potato or corn chips. Crisps have been called many things over the years, including crisps (in Australia and New Zealand), crinkle cut (in Canada) and potato curls. And finally they settled on calling them “chips,” which was not only the most popular term in North America but also one of their original names from before they were forced to change it by American law.

What snack food was legally barred from calling its product “chips”? According to Wikipedia: In 1998 the Food and Drug Administration ruled that Pringles could not call themselves “chips”. In the early 1970s, Pringles (a subsidiary of Proctor & Gamble) was given permission to use the name ‘potato chips’ in Canada.

In 1998, Pringles attempted to register the word as a trademark for potato crisps in Europe and Australia. The application was opposed by both McCain Foods and Smith’s Crisps; they argued that many different types of potato crisps are available so only one company should be able to have exclusive rights over this particular term. This led Kraft Foods Inc., who had been using the label since 1909,[citation needed] to file an opposition with the United States Patent and Trademark Office which eventually won out because it sided with Kraft Foods Inc. and its longstanding use of the term ‘chips’.

This led Pringles to come up with a new name for their product, which they called “potato chips”. This change also meant that it was no longer able to sell them in Canada because of Canadian regulations. In 2005, McCain filed another application for a trademark on potato crisps so as not to infringe Kraft’s rights. However, the European Community granted an order preventing this from happening until 2009 when Kraft withdrew its opposition during negotiations between companies.[citation needed] Thus making McCain free to call themselves chips again.

In December 2011, after negotiating with Proctor & Gamble regarding common packaging goals,[clarification needed] Smiths Cris

Conclusion paragraph:

M&M’s victory was short-lived, though. In 2005, the company that owned Sun Chips at the time renamed them “SunChips” and filed for a trademark on that name. The case went all the way to federal court where it was decided in favor of Frito-Lay because they had been using the term ‘sun chips’ since 1975. They were also able to prove through their own research that consumers knew about both brands and did not consider either one an infringement upon another brand’s intellectual property rights. Though there are now two competing versions of sun chip out there today, we hope you’ll try ours! Who knows? You might end up with something even better than what you’re used to eating!